Well, you cannot even turn around in your own front yard without one of these Mafia-wannabe Purple Shirts trespassing on your property.
The newest Chicago/Union Extortion Scheme: Strong-arm home-based caregivers into joining their ranks.
From the Chicago Tribune: (Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin)
Kathy Keith has cared for a son with Down syndrome for 23 years and never dreamed that one day organized labor would consider her a prime candidate for a union card.
So she was skeptical when representatives from two of the nation’s largest unions began competing for her attention over the last few weeks with unannounced visits to her home, mailings and phone messages promising to fatten her state stipend.
The Bartlett resident is among about 3,000 people who receive state funding to assist someone at home with a developmental disability. As a result of an executive order signed by Gov. Pat Quinn in June that allows collective bargaining by “individual providers of home-based support services,” unions are now trying to sign them up in an unusual effort to boost membership.
The move has left some care providers angry and confused. Many are mothers, fathers or close relatives who are caring for loved ones, advocates say.
“Are you saying I can go on strike and not wipe my son’s rear end?” Keith said, questioning if union membership would pit her interests against her son’s.
Soon, she and others expect to receive ballots by mail that ask them to join the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) or the Service Employees International Union(SEIU). Or they may vote against representation.
Caregivers who vote against joining a union or don’t vote at all would get to choose whether to become members if SEIU or AFSCME receives the most votes, but even if they decline to join, they will have to pay “fair share” dues, according to union representatives.
That folks, is called extortion.
Those “dues” (aka protection money) will be draining what limited resources many of these families have for providing care for their loved ones.
Pam Harris of Western Springs said she will vote against joining a union and is angry over what she calls “strong-arm tactics.” She worries about what will happen if she is forced to join a union as a caregiver for her son, Josh, 20, who has a rare genetic syndrome that causes cognitive and physical disabilities.
“I need that money for my son,” said Harris, who spends $1,400 a month on medical insurance for her son.
Organizers showed up at her doorstep on a recent Sunday morning, she said.
“I am not an employee of the state,” Harris said. “I work from my home. I don’t want the union in my home. I can Norma Rae with the rest of them.”
And the most laughable line:
Anders Lindall of AFSCME addressed some of the fears that families have expressed.
“It is absolutely critical for people to understand that the union would not interfere in any way with their control over hiring or any decisions about the care made for individuals,” he said.
Oh, I am sure the same thing was said when the UAW was formed.
Once they get their foot in the door, the union goons will be dictating, at the government’s behest, who the caregiver can hire, what they can pay the employee etc. After all, since a lot of these caregivers receive government money either via stipends from the state and/or SSI benefits via the federal government, you can bet there will be a lot of hooks and conditions built in. The unions will basically just act as the musclemen for the government.
Purple shirts, brown shirts. It is all the same in the end.