Several months ago, it was discovered that Barack Obama has a 1/2 brother named George. George lives in a slum in Nairobi, Kenya. (Go here to read more on George).

What’s interesting about this situation is that Barack could easily “share the love” and lift his brother out of the slums of Kenya…yet he doesn’t. He could provide money, food and shelter for his brother…but he doesn’t.

And yet this is a man (Barack) who says he’ll do exactly those things, and more, for those in the United States, who’ve been “oppressed”…listen and watch this newly discovered race-baiting audio/video, here.

Well, now comes an interview Barack did just a day or two ago with the cBS “Morning Show”.

Pay attention, starting at 30 seconds:

My next question (which should also be your next question) is:
WHAT ABOUT GEORGE?!

What’s that smell, you ask?
It’s called “BS”.

• 

• Tweet

I was given this august honor by some Lefty Blogspot I had never heard of (which encompasses about 98.7% of them, since no one else has heard of them either) and only found out about this “award” when checking the site’s logs a little earlier tonight. Anyway, as most of you I am sure are aware of, lefty Blogspots are like dead possums and horse crap on the side of a road in a Central Pennsylvania town. They look pretty rough and stink up the place, but no one notices them anyway since they are so ubiquitous.

To wit, he references a comment I made over at Stop the ACLU several days ago:

To be blunt, one of the rumors that I have heard was that OBurkha will not release his medical records because they would show that he is HIV-positive.

Far-fetched? Probably, but since he dodges the question and will not release them, it can only make you wonder.

And here is his erudite post (in it’s entirety) about said comment:

NosferatusCoffin is either a paranoid whackjob, or a lying c__t.

I suppose he missed the above bolded words, since I said in the comment and I will say here that it is probably a far-fetched rumor. But with all of the shadows surrounding this man, it cannot help but make you wonder what might be going on. Anyway, just chalk it up to another lefty who drops political trou at the slightest “slight” against their Moronchurian Candidate.

This is why I say that Obama and his campaign are the Mengele of Political Discourse.

• 

• Tweet

…quite possibly the world’s shortest book, aside from maybe Great English Lovers. (Had to borrow that last part from Fawlty Towers).

The only debate I found worth watching was Palin/Plugs and as expected, Sarah made Plugs the next new member of Hair Club for Men, seeing as she scalped him but clean.

I did follow Michelle’s liveblog and wrap-up of the debate as I was finishing off one of my web design client sites. (Like Joe the Plumber wants to do, I also run a small business). And it seems from reading her coverage as well as the always active commenters that McCain pretty much wiped the floor with Obama. Always good to hear and it seemed to give a shot in the arm to the base. But overall, I think it will make little difference. Because, in the long run (with all of 3 weeks left), I am going to make a prediction that I already have shared with some forum friends over the last couple of weeks.

John McCain wins this election in a blowout.

Yes, you read that right. A blowout.

I am saying that McCain wins this easily because, just look at recent history. America is by nature still a pretty conservative country, even after 75 years of Socialist/Marxist indoctrination and their invasion into all of this country’s major social institutions. The American people rejected less radical candidates such as Gore and Kerry, even though they espoused all of the usual liberal talking points and programs.

There have only been two Democrats to win the Presidency since 1964 and both of them ran as faux-moderates, not statist Stalinsts as Obama is. And even with that phony moderate veneer, in four elections neither one them even got as much as 51% of the vote.

This is why I am saying that if the American voter rejected the above mentioned in four landslide losses over that time and only three close wins during that time, why in the hell would they all of the sudden vote overwhelmingly for an extremely radical, totally inexperienced self-avowed Linsky Marxist? There is nothing in recent history to support it.

• 

• Tweet

Well, it seems that not only is ACORN up to their usual tricks, but now it seems that there is a quiet “purge” of voters going on in six key battle ground states.

- Colorado
- Indiana
- Ohio
- Michigan
- Nevada
- North Carolina

From WDST.com:

NEW YORK (AP) — Tens of thousands of eligible voters have been removed from rolls or blocked from registering in at least six swing states, including Indiana and Michigan, and the voters’ exclusion appears to violate federal law, according to a published report.

The New York Times based its findings on reviews of state records and Social Security data.

The Times said voters appear to have been purged by mistake and not because of any intentional violations by election officials or coordinated efforts by any party.

States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 by removing the names of voters who should no longer be listed. But for every voter added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have removed two, a review of the records shows.

The newspaper said it identified apparent problems in Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina. It says some states are improperly using Social Security data to verify new voters’ registration applications, and others may have broken rules that govern removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election.

And it is not happening in MA, HI, IL or MD? Tell me no!

But wait! There’s more!

It now appears that in Indianapolis/Marion County in Indiana, that there are more people registered to vote then the entire population of registered voters in the county. Shades of Tom Daschle and his Indian Casino buddies giving him a fraudulent win in 2002 over now-senator Thune.

From NewsBusters.org:

WANE, TV 15 out of Fort Wayne, for instance, reported on a visit to that city by Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita (R) who was there to talk about voter fraud. In Lake County the GOP is accusing the Democrats of vote fraud, but the report does not reveal any further details.

The Indianapolis Star, though, had more to say on the issue in an October 7 piece about early voting. After quoting exultant officials about how wonderful it was to see so many new voters registering, the Star had this to say about the Indy area.

In the county, 677,401 voters were registered as of Monday evening; that number was expected to continue growing as last-minute registrations are entered into the system. In 2004, the county had 602,918 registered voters.

Ed Treacy, Marion County Democratic Party chairman, said the campaign of presidential candidate Barack Obama brought in as many as 12,000 new registrations over the weekend alone.

“We’ve never seen anything like it,” Treacy said.

How exciting, eh?

And now to the dull math, so dull that the Indy Star didn’t seem disposed to undertake the effort. Paul K. Ogden, however, helpfully breaks out his calculator for the edification of the press.

According to STATSIndiana, In 2007, Indianapolis/Marion County had an estimated population of 876,804. Of that number 232,607 were below 18 years of age, for a total of 644,197 people in Marion County/Indianapolis 18 or over and thus eligible to vote. (Indiana allows felons to vote as long as they are not incarcerated).

So we have 644,197 people eligible to be registered in Marion County/Indianapolis, and 677,401 people registered. Congratulations go to Indianapolis for having 105% of its residents registered!

There are more registered voters than eligible ones in the capital city? And the media are not all over this?

Well, because as one comment noted, most of the GOP complaints about voter fraud are pointed at blue-as-Tidy-Bowl Gary, IN. A real shock, eh

And for to wrap things up, a little video entertainment. See voter fraud in action!

Hat-tip to Babalu Blog for video.

The comment by Claudia4Libertad sums it up perfectly:

so, there is NOTHING the government can do to stop ACORN??? We can put a man on the moon but we can’t arrest a bunch of 1960′s throwbacks???

Amen.

• 

• Tweet

A brilliant summary by Stanley Kurtz via National Review, of ACORN’s behind-the-scenes involvement in the whole mortgage and banking scandal. Starting from 1977 and the passage of the CRA, to their criminal Chicago-style thug/intimidation tactics of banks to their elevation to a virtual cabinet-level position and influence in rewriting Fannie and Freddie mortgage policy in the mid-1990s under the Clinton administration.

Some highlights:

Democrats and ACORN
As early as 1987, ACORN began pressuring Fannie and Freddie to review their standards, with modest results. By 1989, ACORN had lured Fannie Mae into the first of many “pilot projects” designed to help local banks lower credit standards. But it was all small potatoes until the serious pressure began in early 1991. At that point, Democratic Senator Allan Dixon convened a Senate subcommittee hearing at which an ACORN representative gave key testimony. It’s probably not a coincidence that Dixon, like Obama, was an Illinois Democrat, since Chicago has long been a stronghold of ACORN influence.

Dixon gave credibility to ACORN’s accusations of loan bias, although these claims of racism were disputed by Missouri Republican, Christopher Bond. ACORN’s spokesman strenuously complained that his organization’s efforts to relax local credit standards were being blocked by requirements set by the secondary market. Dixon responded by pressing Fannie and Freddie to do more to relax those standards — and by promising to introduce legislation that would ensure it. At this early stage, Fannie and Freddie walked a fine line between promising to do more, while protesting any wholesale reduction of credit requirements.

By July of 1991, ACORN’s legislative campaign began to bear fruit. As the Chicago Tribune put it, “Housing activists have been pushing hard to improve housing for the poor by extracting greater financial support from the country’s two highly profitable secondary mortgage-market companies. Thanks to the help of sympathetic lawmakers, it appeared…that they may succeed.” The Tribune went on to explain that House Democrat Henry Gonzales had announced that Fannie and Freddie had agreed to commit $3.5 billion to low-income housing in 1992 and 1993, in addition to a just-announced $10 billion “affordable housing loan program” by Fannie Mae. The article emphasizes ACORN pressure and notes that Fannie and Freddie had been fighting against the plan as recently as a week before agreement was reached. Fannie and Freddie gave in only to stave off even more restrictive legislation floated by congressional Democrats.

Pretty amazing stuff. As mentioned later, they really got their teeth into all of this once The Rapist-in-Chief was sworn in:

Another factor working in ACORN’s favor was that its increasing success with local banks turned those banks into allies in the battle with Fannie and Freddie. Precisely because ACORN’s local pressure tactics were working, banks themselves now wanted Fannie and Freddie to loosen their standards still further, so as to buy up still more of the high-risk loans they’d made at ACORN’s insistence. So by the 1993, a grand alliance of ACORN, national Democrats, and local bankers looking for someone to lessen the risks imposed on them by CRA and ACORN were uniting to pressure Fannie and Freddie to loosen credit standards still further.

At this point, both ACORN and the Clinton administration were working together to impose large numerical targets or “set asides” (really a sort of poor and minority loan quota system) on Fannie and Freddie. ACORN called for at least half of Fannie and Freddie loans to go to low-income customers. At first the Clinton administration offered a set-aside of 30 percent. But eventually ACORN got what it wanted. In early 1994, the Clinton administration floated plans for committing $1 trillion in loans to low- and moderate-income home-buyers, which would amount to about half of Fannie Mae’s business by the end of the decade. Wall Street Analysts attributed Fannie Mae’s willingness to go along with the change to the need to protect itself against still more severe “congressional attack.” News reports also highlighted praise for the change from ACORN’s head lobbyist, Deepak Bhargava.

As can be seen here, there was and is a lot more to this urban organized mafia then just simply helping the Dems steal elections by turning in fraudulent voter registration cards or “counseling” low-income households into getting essentially “welfare housing” by making noise at the local bank. Just like Soros, they were acting as snakes in the grass to destroy the very structure and integrity of this country’s financial centers, thereby making nationalization of said institutions as easy as walk in the park. Just have a few higher-ups yell “PANIC! The world economy will be in recession in 48 hours if we do not do anything!!!” and BOOM. The government now owns your mortgage, regardless of it’s status. And with that came The Mortgage Extortion Bill, which in addition to giving the government ownership of virtually all U.S. mortgages, also includes plenty of pork for ACORN and other Terrorist Left groups.

And you know once government gets a hold of something, it will 1) never let go of it and 2) will start regulating it. You think there is too much government in your lives now, wait until they start regulating your home. What type of energy it can use, whether you can upgrade it, or whether you can smoke in it. Not to mention, this also gives the ACORN types the power to achieve the ultimate in social engineering. Determining where you can live.

Sounds a lot like Maoist China, does it not?

• 

• Tweet

This is what I counted on….
The Obama camp has tapped into their endless supply of arrogance, concerning the connections between an unapologetic convicted terrorist, and the Obamessiah:

Stunning:

(snip)

Hours before Barack Obama is scheduled to square off against John McCain at the second presidential debate in Nashville, Obama’s campaign manager disclosed new details about his candidate’s relationship with domestic terrorist William Ayers.

According to a report from the Chicago Tribune, Axelrod discussed Obama’s friendship with Ayers on a campaign plane ride.

Axelrod said he did not know the “exact moment” Obama discovered Ayers had plotted to bomb the Capitol and the Pentagon, but it was sometime during their initial meetings. It did not deter Obama from participating in educational projects with Ayers.

(Read the rest at the Townhall link provided above).

Pardon me for wondering out loud here but….wouldn’t this be equal to any “Jack” or “Jane” citizen in America, maintaining a “friendly” relationship with American terrorist Adam Gadahn, all the while insisting that Gadahn’s past actions, stances or wishes for his own country, “did not deter” the friendship in any way????

Are folks REALLY sure they want to elect a man who’s “not deterred” by this kind of stance? How about this kind of stance? Let alone the Ayers’s willingness to bomb their own country.

Spread the word….

• 

• Tweet

Are you a democrat and a member of minority?
Are you a democrat and a “drop-out”?
Are you a democrat with a “GED”?

If your answer is “yes” to any of those,….the Colorado Democracy Alliance, along with the Colorado state liberal infrastructure, view you as an “idiot”.

Think I’m joking? See here, here, and here.

Kinda makes you feel all “special”, does it not?
Good times….

• 

• Tweet